Unterallgäu: the 2025 federal election result
In the federal election on 23 February 2025, CSU led in Unterallgäu with 40.2% of the second votes, followed by AfD with 23.8%. Below, the results of all 52 municipalities.
- District Administrator
- Hans-Joachim Weirather, since 2006 · Wikidata
- Population
- 147,386 · 120 per km²
- Largest sector
- Manufacturing 41%
- Turnout
- 85.3% · Bavaria 84.3% · Germany 82.5%
- Voters
- 94,214 of 110,410 eligible voters
- Compared with Bavaria
- CSU +3.0 · AfD +4.8 · SPD −3.4 · Grüne −4.3
- CSU range across municipalities
- 35.0% to 52.1%
Bavaria local elections 2026: result in Unterallgäu
Official result of the election of 8 March 2026, run-offs on 22 March 2026, from the data of Bayerisches Landesamt für Statistik. Overview of all districts.
- Largest list in the Kreistag
- CSU 30.2% (18/60)
- Landrat
- Eder, Alex (FREIE WÄHLER/Freie Wähler Unterallgäu e.V.), 52.6%
- Turnout
- 67.0%
- CSU30.2% · 18 seats
- Freie Wähler/Freie Wähler Unterallgäu e.V.25.6% · 15 seats
- AfD17.4% · 10 seats
- GRÜNE9.0% · 5 seats
- Junge Wähler Union6.4% · 4 seats
- SPD6.0% · 4 seats
- Die Linke2.8% · 2 seats
- ÖDP/Bürger für die Umwelt2.7% · 2 seats
Turnout 67.0% · 117,918 eligible voters · 60 seats
Source: Bayerisches Landesamt für Statistik, Kommunalwahlen 2026 in Bayern, Ergebnis-Downloads (XML) (file), final result, retrieved 3 Nov 2026, Nutzung mit Quellenangabe (AGB des Landesamts). Gremienwahl: Stadträte der kreisfreien Städte und Kreistage; Personenwahl nur Gemeinden über 10.000 Einwohner. Gemeinderäte kreisangehöriger Gemeinden liegen beim Landesamt nur als PDF vor. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.
Landrat election Unterallgäu
First round 8 March 2026
- Eder, Alex, FREIE WÄHLER/Freie Wähler Unterallgäu e.V.52.6%
- Winter, Verena, CSU25.7%
- Maier, Christoph, AfD14.8%
- Schmid, Dr. Otto, GRÜNE6.9%
Turnout 67.2% · 117,916 eligible voters
Second votes in Unterallgäu
Deviation from the state result in points.
Where do these figures come from?
Official results of the 2025 federal election from the Federal Returning Officer's district file, second votes per district.
What does the comparison show?
The lighter bar is the state result of the same election, so you can see where the area differs from its state. Differences are in percentage points.
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by independent city and district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.
2024 European election in Unterallgäu
In the European election on 9 June 2024, CSU came first in Unterallgäu with 42.3% of the vote; in Bavaria CSU got 39.7%. The bars show the European election shares, the small figures the gap to the 2025 federal election in the same area.
In the 2024 European election, CSU was the strongest party in Unterallgäu with 42.3%, +2.1 points compared with the 2025 federal election. Turnout was 65.4% (2025 federal election: 85.3%).
Why do the European and federal elections differ?
The European election has no electoral threshold, so small parties such as Volt, Die PARTEI or the animal-welfare party win more votes. Turnout is much lower, and the political mood shifted between June 2024 and February 2025. The single European-election vote is compared with the second vote of the federal election in the same area; parties that count as Others in 2025 get no difference.
Where do these figures come from?
Official final result of the 2024 European election from the Federal Returning Officer (kerg2.csv), votes per district and independent city.
| Party | Votes 2024 | European election 2024 | Federal election 2025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSU | 30,999 | 42.3% | 40.2% | +2.1 |
| AfD | 12,186 | 16.6% | 23.8% | -7.2 |
| Freie Wähler | 7,634 | 10.4% | 6.2% | +4.2 |
| Grüne | 5,306 | 7.2% | 7.7% | -0.5 |
| SPD | 4,113 | 5.6% | 8.1% | -2.5 |
| BSW | 2,768 | 3.8% | 2.9% | +0.9 |
| FDP | 2,492 | 3.4% | 4.2% | -0.8 |
| ÖDP | 1,906 | 2.6% | – | – |
| Die PARTEI | 990 | 1.3% | – | – |
| Tierschutzpartei | 713 | 1.0% | – | – |
| Volt | 745 | 1.0% | 0.4% | +0.6 |
| Linke | 641 | 0.9% | 4.0% | -3.1 |
| Others | 2,845 | 3.9% | – | – |
ÖDP, Die PARTEI, Tierschutzpartei: counted as Others in the 2025 federal election, so no difference is shown.
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2024 European election, results by state and district (kerg2.csv) (file), final result, retrieved 28 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Berlin East and Berlin West are aggregated from the boroughs as in the 2025 federal election. Comparison values: second votes of the 2025 federal election in the same area. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.
Unterallgäu in figures
Key facts about the place from official statistics and Wikidata, so the election result can be put in context. The figures describe, they do not explain.
- Population
- 147,386 (as of 2025-12-31)
- Area
- 1,229.6 km²
- Population density
- 120 inhabitants per km²
- Under 19
- 18.6%
- 67 and older
- 19.1%
- Foreign nationals (2022 census)
- 10.2%
- Employees subject to social insurance (place of work)
- 59,611 (as of 2025-12-31)
- Largest sectors
- Manufacturing 41% · Trade and vehicle repair 12% · Construction 10%
- Commuter balance
- -8,999 (more out-commuters than in-commuters)
- Unemployment rate
- 2.6% (as of 2026-09)
- Ehrmann SE
- 2,400 employees (2018)
- UPM Ettringen
- 250 employees (2017-11-22)
- Schwermer Dietrich Stiel
- 100 employees
- Raiffeisenbank Pfaffenhausen
- 71 employees (2016-12-31)
- District seat
- Bad Wörishofen, St
- Municipalities
- 53
- First mention or foundation
- 1972
- Website
- www.unterallgaeu.de
- Wikipedia
- Unterallgäu (Wikipedia)
Unterallgäu has 147,386 inhabitants. The largest sector is Manufacturing with 41% of employees. The largest company headquartered in Unterallgäu is Ehrmann SE with 2,400 employees. The unemployment rate is 2.6%.
Where do the profile figures come from?
Population, area and coordinates from the Federal Statistical Office's municipality register, employees, sectors and unemployment from the Federal Employment Agency, age structure from the 2022 census, coat of arms, website and companies from Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons. All sources are openly licensed and linked below the list.
Does the profile explain the election result?
No. It describes the place so readers can put figures in context. Whether sector, age or density relate to voting can only be tested across many places, not from a single result.
Sources: Wikidata (CC0 1.0) · Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), Gemeindeverzeichnis GV-ISys (Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – Version 2.0) · Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (© Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit, Nutzung mit Quellenangabe) · Zensus 2022, Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder, Regionaltabelle Demografie (Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – Version 2.0)
Strongest party by municipality in Unterallgäu
Tap to open the municipality result. Labels appear on the largest municipalities by area; all values are in the table below.
Strongest party: CSU in 51 municipalities and AfD in 1 municipality of 52. Highest share: CSU with 52.1% in Hawangen.
What does the map show?
Each municipality is coloured by the party with the highest second-vote share at the 2025 federal election; the intensity follows the share. Postal votes counted at the level of a joint administration are shown on the administration's page. Click a municipality for its full result.
All municipalities in Unterallgäu
Sorted by number of voters. Range across the district: CSU 35 to 52.1%, AfD 16.9 to 38.3%, SPD 3.8 to 10.7%, Grüne 2.9 to 12%, Freie Wähler 3.1 to 10.1%, FDP 2.1 to 6.2%, Linke 1.2 to 6.6%.
| Municipality | Voters | Turnout | CSU | AfD | SPD | Grüne | Freie Wähler | FDP | Linke |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bad Wörishofen, St | 9,690 | 80.8% | 41.8 | 19.9 | 9.7 | 7.9 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 4.4 |
| Mindelheim, St | 8,629 | 81.7% | 37.8 | 22.1 | 10.4 | 8.6 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 5.1 |
| Ottobeuren, M | 5,506 | 85.1% | 40.8 | 19.6 | 9.0 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 4.8 |
| Türkheim, M | 4,518 | 82.7% | 36.3 | 23.6 | 10.1 | 8.4 | 5.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Bad Grönenbach, M | 3,711 | 86.1% | 40.6 | 20.6 | 8.9 | 11.6 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 4.4 |
| Babenhausen, M | 3,324 | 82.8% | 39.2 | 25.1 | 9.0 | 6.6 | 5.5 | 5.2 | 4.1 |
| Markt Rettenbach, M | 2,700 | 86.7% | 38.7 | 27.8 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 8.4 | 3.2 | 3.9 |
| Ettringen | 2,235 | 87.2% | 41.5 | 24.4 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 8.0 | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| Erkheim, M | 2,213 | 88.3% | 40.6 | 22.1 | 7.9 | 8.9 | 6.8 | 4.7 | 3.4 |
| Legau, M | 2,173 | 85.7% | 41.2 | 23.5 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 3.7 |
| Tussenhausen, M | 2,080 | 89.0% | 41.5 | 28.6 | 8.3 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Buxheim | 2,076 | 85.9% | 38.5 | 19.0 | 9.4 | 12.0 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 4.6 |
| Memmingerberg | 1,851 | 85.5% | 35.1 | 25.6 | 10.7 | 8.0 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 4.7 |
| Sontheim | 1,851 | 88.6% | 39.0 | 25.0 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 3.7 | 4.1 |
| Kirchheim i.Schw., M | 1,670 | 83.8% | 41.8 | 26.5 | 6.8 | 4.7 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 2.6 |
| Breitenbrunn | 1,579 | 87.1% | 41.0 | 29.9 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 9.4 | 3.9 | 2.2 |
| Pfaffenhausen, M | 1,578 | 82.8% | 47.3 | 20.4 | 6.3 | 4.8 | 7.4 | 5.1 | 3.3 |
| Dirlewang, M | 1,536 | 87.8% | 40.3 | 25.2 | 6.4 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 4.1 | 3.7 |
| Westerheim | 1,530 | 88.3% | 41.6 | 22.7 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Boos | 1,521 | 87.4% | 38.5 | 25.6 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 5.0 |
| Markt Wald, M | 1,519 | 87.1% | 37.0 | 33.5 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 10.1 | 3.5 | 2.9 |
| Woringen | 1,431 | 88.2% | 39.4 | 22.7 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 5.3 |
| Benningen | 1,390 | 86.4% | 35.5 | 25.2 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Wolfertschwenden | 1,345 | 84.7% | 43.0 | 21.3 | 7.4 | 9.9 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
| Eppishausen | 1,336 | 88.3% | 48.4 | 25.7 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 2.1 | 2.4 |
| Kronburg | 1,310 | 88.6% | 39.7 | 22.4 | 8.7 | 10.8 | 5.5 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Heimertingen | 1,302 | 88.8% | 44.2 | 16.9 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 6.9 | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Kammlach | 1,292 | 85.6% | 41.5 | 26.9 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| Kettershausen | 1,248 | 82.7% | 39.9 | 29.8 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 8.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Lachen | 1,158 | 88.8% | 35.8 | 26.8 | 5.4 | 9.5 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 3.8 |
| Trunkelsberg | 1,125 | 88.4% | 38.9 | 24.0 | 10.2 | 7.5 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 4.4 |
| Rammingen | 1,087 | 88.4% | 42.1 | 23.8 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 3.8 |
| Wiedergeltingen | 1,033 | 88.9% | 37.7 | 24.9 | 8.0 | 8.7 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 3.9 |
| Salgen | 1,026 | 88.1% | 44.0 | 28.1 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 8.8 | 3.7 | 1.7 |
| Stetten | 1,004 | 87.6% | 41.5 | 26.9 | 6.4 | 4.6 | 6.9 | 2.3 | 3.9 |
| Unteregg | 1,001 | 88.7% | 42.3 | 25.3 | 5.2 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Niederrieden | 998 | 87.5% | 44.6 | 23.6 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 7.4 | 3.2 | 2.8 |
| Amberg | 987 | 87.9% | 39.0 | 21.8 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 5.8 | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Lauben | 967 | 87.9% | 42.2 | 24.8 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 |
| Holzgünz | 916 | 89.5% | 36.3 | 28.9 | 8.2 | 7.7 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 4.5 |
| Kirchhaslach | 871 | 86.5% | 35.3 | 38.3 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Hawangen | 866 | 88.6% | 52.1 | 18.2 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 2.9 |
| Oberrieden | 863 | 89.1% | 37.2 | 35.1 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 2.7 |
| Egg a.d.Günz | 833 | 88.3% | 40.9 | 28.1 | 6.8 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 2.8 |
| Lautrach | 817 | 79.4% | 37.9 | 19.7 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 4.3 |
| Oberschönegg | 751 | 91.0% | 39.2 | 30.3 | 6.7 | 4.8 | 6.8 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Ungerhausen | 703 | 86.9% | 44.2 | 19.3 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
| Fellheim | 675 | 83.5% | 37.0 | 24.6 | 7.7 | 9.2 | 5.5 | 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Winterrieden | 650 | 87.0% | 48.1 | 23.7 | 6.3 | 5.2 | 6.8 | 3.9 | 1.5 |
| Apfeltrach | 643 | 86.4% | 35.0 | 34.4 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 4.2 |
| Pleß | 591 | 87.0% | 43.0 | 24.0 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 7.5 | 4.4 | 2.0 |
| Böhen | 505 | 88.1% | 48.4 | 20.4 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 8.7 | 5.0 | 1.2 |
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by polling district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Municipal results are the sum of a municipality's polling districts including the postal-vote districts assigned to it. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.