Würzburg: the 2025 federal election result
In the federal election on 23 February 2025, CSU led in Würzburg with 41.1% of the second votes, followed by AfD with 14.7%. Below, the results of all 52 municipalities.
- District AdministratorEberhard Nuß (CSU) · Wikidata
- Turnout88.5% · Bavaria 84.3% · Germany 82.5%
- Voters111,857 of 126,449 eligible voters
- Compared with BavariaCSU +3.9 · AfD −4.3 · SPD +1.7 · Grüne +1.0
- CSU range across municipalities32.3% to 56.5%
Second votes in Würzburg
Deviation from the state result in points.
- CSU41.1%+3.9
- AfD14.7%-4.3
- SPD13.2%+1.7
- Grüne13.0%+1.0
- Linke5.3%-0.4
- FDP4.0%-0.2
- Freie Wähler3.1%-1.2
- BSW2.7%-0.4
- Volt0.8%+0.2
- Others2.1%-0.2
Change compared with the result in Bavaria.
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by independent city and district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.
Strongest party by municipality in Würzburg
Tap to open the municipality result. Labels appear on the largest municipalities by area; all values are in the table below.
All municipalities in Würzburg
Sorted by number of voters. Range across the district: CSU 32.3 to 56.5%, AfD 8.8 to 22.5%, SPD 4.1 to 18.3%, Grüne 3.1 to 20%, Linke 2.5 to 9.7%, FDP 2.7 to 5.5%, Freie Wähler 1.6 to 7.9%.
| Municipality | Voters | Turnout | CSU | AfD | SPD | Grüne | Linke | FDP | Freie Wähler |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ochsenfurt, St | 7,009 | 84.1% | 39.1 | 16.9 | 14.4 | 10.9 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 3.2 |
| Höchberg, M | 6,607 | 89.7% | 35.2 | 10.2 | 15.5 | 20.0 | 6.7 | 5.4 | 1.6 |
| Veitshöchheim | 6,399 | 85.9% | 37.0 | 14.3 | 14.1 | 16.1 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 2.0 |
| Rimpar, M | 5,186 | 88.3% | 42.3 | 15.2 | 13.8 | 12.0 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 2.7 |
| Gerbrunn | 4,319 | 87.6% | 32.3 | 11.5 | 15.3 | 18.3 | 9.7 | 4.5 | 1.8 |
| Estenfeld | 3,814 | 89.8% | 43.4 | 12.4 | 12.5 | 14.4 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 2.8 |
| Rottendorf | 3,760 | 89.4% | 39.0 | 14.7 | 13.7 | 13.2 | 6.1 | 4.8 | 2.2 |
| Kürnach | 3,431 | 91.6% | 42.4 | 12.3 | 13.6 | 15.0 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
| Giebelstadt, M | 3,387 | 84.7% | 41.2 | 21.9 | 10.4 | 8.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.3 |
| Waldbüttelbrunn | 3,370 | 87.3% | 38.2 | 13.9 | 15.1 | 14.7 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Güntersleben | 3,074 | 89.1% | 40.4 | 15.3 | 18.3 | 10.7 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| Reichenberg, M | 2,899 | 89.9% | 37.5 | 14.6 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 3.4 |
| Zell a.Main, M | 2,763 | 85.6% | 33.3 | 14.2 | 15.2 | 17.5 | 7.1 | 3.9 | 2.1 |
| Hettstadt | 2,625 | 89.9% | 42.4 | 14.0 | 13.6 | 12.5 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| Bergtheim | 2,619 | 88.7% | 44.2 | 15.5 | 11.4 | 12.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 4.5 |
| Randersacker, M | 2,445 | 89.1% | 38.3 | 12.4 | 13.8 | 16.1 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| Margetshöchheim | 2,320 | 91.1% | 38.1 | 10.8 | 17.0 | 17.5 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 1.9 |
| Eisingen | 2,278 | 83.8% | 37.1 | 15.3 | 14.4 | 12.8 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 2.9 |
| Leinach | 2,277 | 89.1% | 45.8 | 15.8 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| Eibelstadt, St | 2,219 | 89.0% | 40.8 | 11.6 | 15.5 | 15.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 2.3 |
| Unterpleichfeld | 2,177 | 90.3% | 49.3 | 12.0 | 9.4 | 11.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
| Waldbrunn | 1,976 | 89.7% | 45.2 | 13.9 | 12.1 | 11.5 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 2.2 |
| Thüngersheim | 1,893 | 88.1% | 41.0 | 12.7 | 13.5 | 14.2 | 6.1 | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| Helmstadt, M | 1,831 | 89.8% | 49.2 | 16.7 | 8.2 | 9.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 4.7 |
| Hausen b.Würzburg | 1,807 | 90.4% | 44.9 | 15.5 | 11.1 | 10.9 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.0 |
| Gaukönigshofen | 1,798 | 91.1% | 51.8 | 16.0 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 5.2 |
| Kist | 1,792 | 85.7% | 40.1 | 20.9 | 14.3 | 8.3 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| Theilheim | 1,675 | 90.4% | 43.9 | 16.0 | 13.1 | 10.7 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 2.7 |
| Kirchheim | 1,540 | 89.3% | 43.2 | 16.0 | 15.4 | 11.2 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Neubrunn, M | 1,505 | 86.7% | 43.7 | 21.4 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 3.7 |
| Altertheim | 1,408 | 88.3% | 39.7 | 15.7 | 13.8 | 12.0 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Sommerhausen, M | 1,402 | 90.9% | 44.8 | 8.8 | 13.6 | 15.9 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 2.3 |
| Kleinrinderfeld | 1,353 | 88.5% | 35.7 | 20.1 | 17.6 | 8.7 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| Uettingen | 1,329 | 90.4% | 36.4 | 19.1 | 12.8 | 11.2 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Erlabrunn | 1,316 | 90.2% | 42.2 | 9.2 | 17.0 | 15.6 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 2.3 |
| Greußenheim | 1,172 | 89.2% | 47.0 | 15.6 | 8.6 | 10.5 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 4.7 |
| Röttingen, St | 1,112 | 88.9% | 50.9 | 15.7 | 9.5 | 8.6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Remlingen, M | 1,074 | 88.2% | 35.1 | 19.7 | 11.3 | 13.1 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Winterhausen, M | 997 | 88.9% | 39.7 | 12.7 | 15.9 | 14.8 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 2.9 |
| Geroldshausen | 948 | 90.0% | 37.0 | 17.1 | 15.8 | 10.5 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 3.4 |
| Eisenheim, M | 931 | 89.6% | 44.0 | 13.7 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 3.3 |
| Aub, St | 921 | 88.3% | 51.7 | 15.8 | 7.0 | 8.6 | 6.5 | 3.2 | 4.6 |
| Bütthard, M | 907 | 89.5% | 51.1 | 15.0 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 5.8 |
| Prosselsheim | 818 | 92.7% | 44.5 | 15.9 | 10.4 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 5.7 |
| Frickenhausen a.Main, M | 803 | 87.0% | 43.4 | 16.7 | 11.4 | 10.0 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Oberpleichfeld | 803 | 90.3% | 47.0 | 16.4 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 5.8 |
| Holzkirchen | 725 | 92.5% | 48.6 | 14.9 | 11.9 | 8.6 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 2.5 |
| Bieberehren | 656 | 92.3% | 49.3 | 16.5 | 9.0 | 7.6 | 5.5 | 3.1 | 5.2 |
| Sonderhofen | 623 | 90.9% | 56.5 | 13.4 | 5.6 | 7.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 7.9 |
| Tauberrettersheim | 592 | 90.4% | 54.5 | 17.9 | 5.4 | 8.3 | 5.2 | 2.9 | 3.4 |
| Gelchsheim, M | 588 | 91.2% | 50.5 | 16.7 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Riedenheim | 584 | 95.1% | 53.7 | 22.5 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 7.7 |
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by polling district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Municipal results are the sum of a municipality's polling districts including the postal-vote districts assigned to it. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.