Regensburg: the 2025 federal election result
In the federal election on 23 February 2025, CSU led in Regensburg with 40.1% of the second votes, followed by AfD with 22.0%. Below, the results of all 41 municipalities.
- District AdministratorTanja Schweiger (Freie Wähler), since 2014 · Wikidata
- Turnout86.5% · Bavaria 84.3% · Germany 82.5%
- Voters128,887 of 149,027 eligible voters
- Compared with BavariaCSU +2.9 · AfD +3.0 · SPD −1.9 · Grüne −3.1
- CSU range across municipalities34.2% to 45.9%
Second votes in Regensburg
Deviation from the state result in points.
- CSU40.1%+2.9
- AfD22.0%+3.0
- SPD9.6%-1.9
- Grüne8.9%-3.1
- Freie Wähler6.9%+2.6
- Linke4.1%-1.6
- FDP3.1%-1.1
- BSW2.7%-0.4
- Volt0.6%±0
- Others1.9%-0.4
Change compared with the result in Bavaria.
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by independent city and district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.
Strongest party by municipality in Regensburg
Tap to open the municipality result. Labels appear on the largest municipalities by area; all values are in the table below.
All municipalities in Regensburg
Sorted by number of voters. Range across the district: CSU 34.2 to 45.9%, AfD 13.6 to 28.8%, SPD 4.5 to 11.8%, Grüne 3.8 to 14.8%, Freie Wähler 4.3 to 13.7%, Linke 2 to 6.2%, FDP 1.8 to 4.5%.
| Municipality | Voters | Turnout | CSU | AfD | SPD | Grüne | Freie Wähler | Linke | FDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regenstauf, M | 10,507 | 85.1% | 39.3 | 25.7 | 9.6 | 7.3 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 2.9 |
| Lappersdorf, M | 8,964 | 86.4% | 38.8 | 16.8 | 11.4 | 14.0 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 3.4 |
| Neutraubling, St | 7,145 | 77.7% | 35.6 | 25.8 | 10.6 | 7.8 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 3.0 |
| Wenzenbach | 6,004 | 87.6% | 39.1 | 22.5 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
| Hemau, St | 5,877 | 85.2% | 43.4 | 26.2 | 7.3 | 4.6 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 2.8 |
| Nittendorf, M | 5,859 | 85.0% | 38.5 | 20.3 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 2.9 |
| Obertraubling | 5,586 | 86.0% | 40.0 | 20.8 | 10.0 | 9.9 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 3.1 |
| Schierling, M | 5,243 | 84.7% | 38.6 | 24.1 | 9.6 | 5.9 | 9.8 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Sinzing | 5,151 | 90.3% | 39.9 | 15.4 | 10.2 | 14.8 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 3.7 |
| Pentling | 4,352 | 88.0% | 42.4 | 16.9 | 9.7 | 11.1 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Bernhardswald | 4,001 | 89.3% | 44.6 | 22.2 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 7.0 | 3.4 | 2.6 |
| Zeitlarn | 3,905 | 87.8% | 40.5 | 21.3 | 10.8 | 8.7 | 6.0 | 4.2 | 3.7 |
| Beratzhausen, M | 3,721 | 85.9% | 42.2 | 20.4 | 8.6 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 4.7 | 3.0 |
| Laaber, M | 3,704 | 89.3% | 39.5 | 19.1 | 11.8 | 11.0 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 2.8 |
| Barbing | 3,702 | 87.0% | 39.6 | 25.7 | 8.8 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Tegernheim | 3,652 | 86.4% | 40.9 | 18.6 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 3.9 |
| Mintraching | 3,338 | 87.1% | 40.8 | 24.5 | 7.5 | 7.6 | 9.0 | 2.9 | 3.1 |
| Wörth a.d.Donau, St | 3,137 | 85.1% | 39.8 | 25.1 | 8.9 | 6.5 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Donaustauf, M | 2,907 | 89.1% | 42.5 | 18.7 | 10.1 | 11.2 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 3.4 |
| Pettendorf | 2,461 | 90.9% | 38.9 | 13.6 | 10.2 | 14.4 | 8.4 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Thalmassing | 2,410 | 89.2% | 42.8 | 24.0 | 7.7 | 7.2 | 8.7 | 2.7 | 2.6 |
| Alteglofsheim | 2,254 | 87.6% | 40.1 | 20.1 | 9.0 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 4.1 | 2.5 |
| Pfatter | 2,217 | 88.7% | 45.2 | 23.6 | 7.1 | 5.1 | 9.0 | 2.3 | 3.1 |
| Kallmünz, M | 1,999 | 88.5% | 39.1 | 18.4 | 11.6 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 4.4 | 2.2 |
| Wiesent | 1,842 | 86.7% | 41.0 | 22.3 | 8.7 | 8.4 | 6.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 |
| Köfering | 1,770 | 84.2% | 37.3 | 25.7 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 5.9 | 4.6 | 2.9 |
| Sünching | 1,482 | 84.4% | 38.5 | 24.9 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| Brennberg | 1,447 | 89.4% | 38.6 | 27.3 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 2.8 |
| Deuerling | 1,441 | 91.9% | 43.6 | 17.6 | 9.8 | 10.7 | 6.1 | 3.6 | 3.1 |
| Hagelstadt | 1,367 | 87.3% | 42.7 | 26.0 | 7.5 | 5.7 | 8.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| Aufhausen | 1,304 | 87.7% | 43.0 | 23.4 | 7.4 | 3.8 | 11.4 | 3.1 | 2.2 |
| Bach a.d.Donau | 1,225 | 85.5% | 43.5 | 22.9 | 9.9 | 6.6 | 6.2 | 3.6 | 3.0 |
| Duggendorf | 1,139 | 89.0% | 37.1 | 22.1 | 10.8 | 7.8 | 10.3 | 3.8 | 2.1 |
| Pfakofen | 1,129 | 88.9% | 44.6 | 24.2 | 7.8 | 5.8 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| Altenthann | 1,120 | 89.2% | 41.7 | 28.8 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 11.4 | 3.1 | 2.1 |
| Brunn | 1,088 | 89.7% | 39.7 | 21.0 | 11.6 | 9.2 | 6.6 | 4.7 | 2.0 |
| Wolfsegg | 1,078 | 87.5% | 34.2 | 23.1 | 8.5 | 9.9 | 13.7 | 3.7 | 1.8 |
| Pielenhofen | 1,025 | 87.7% | 34.6 | 24.5 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Mötzing | 997 | 87.2% | 38.3 | 25.0 | 8.0 | 6.8 | 8.5 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| Holzheim a.Forst | 766 | 88.4% | 43.8 | 24.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 10.7 | 3.8 | 3.1 |
| Riekofen | 571 | 88.3% | 45.9 | 27.2 | 6.7 | 5.1 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by polling district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Municipal results are the sum of a municipality's polling districts including the postal-vote districts assigned to it. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.