Amberg-Sulzbach: the 2025 federal election result
In the federal election on 23 February 2025, CSU led in Amberg-Sulzbach with 38.6% of the second votes, followed by AfD with 22.7%. Below, the results of all 27 municipalities.
- District AdministratorRichard Reisinger (CSU), since 2008 · Wikidata
- Turnout85.4% · Bavaria 84.3% · Germany 82.5%
- Voters68,686 of 80,472 eligible voters
- Compared with BavariaCSU +1.4 · AfD +3.7 · SPD +0.7 · Freie Wähler +2.7
- CSU range across municipalities30.5% to 45.6%
Second votes in Amberg-Sulzbach
Deviation from the state result in points.
- CSU38.6%+1.4
- AfD22.7%+3.7
- SPD12.2%+0.7
- Freie Wähler7.0%+2.7
- Grüne6.8%-5.2
- Linke4.1%-1.6
- FDP3.0%-1.2
- BSW2.6%-0.5
- Volt0.4%-0.2
- Others2.4%+0.1
Change compared with the result in Bavaria.
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by independent city and district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.
Strongest party by municipality in Amberg-Sulzbach
Tap to open the municipality result. Labels appear on the largest municipalities by area; all values are in the table below.
All municipalities in Amberg-Sulzbach
Sorted by number of voters. Range across the district: CSU 30.5 to 45.6%, AfD 16.8 to 30.2%, SPD 5.8 to 16.4%, Freie Wähler 4.2 to 20.9%, Grüne 4.3 to 10.4%, Linke 2.4 to 6.2%, FDP 2 to 4.2%.
| Municipality | Voters | Turnout | CSU | AfD | SPD | Freie Wähler | Grüne | Linke | FDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sulzbach-Rosenberg, St | 11,697 | 80.6% | 31.6 | 26.0 | 15.0 | 4.5 | 7.8 | 5.5 | 3.0 |
| Kümmersbruck | 6,593 | 85.1% | 39.2 | 23.6 | 13.0 | 4.4 | 6.8 | 4.2 | 3.3 |
| Auerbach i.d.OPf., St | 5,579 | 83.2% | 40.4 | 19.4 | 14.8 | 6.6 | 6.0 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Hirschau, St | 3,916 | 85.5% | 38.3 | 22.2 | 13.2 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 3.6 | 3.3 |
| Hahnbach, M | 3,536 | 88.4% | 45.5 | 19.7 | 10.1 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 2.7 | 3.2 |
| Vilseck, St | 3,481 | 82.6% | 39.5 | 25.7 | 8.7 | 10.6 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 2.6 |
| Freudenberg | 3,005 | 90.0% | 45.6 | 18.5 | 10.5 | 7.6 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
| Schnaittenbach, St | 2,839 | 84.5% | 39.3 | 23.1 | 13.5 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 3.4 | 2.8 |
| Ursensollen | 2,761 | 89.5% | 44.2 | 22.6 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 6.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 |
| Poppenricht | 2,414 | 90.2% | 38.6 | 22.7 | 14.5 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 2.7 |
| Rieden, M | 1,841 | 86.7% | 38.6 | 30.2 | 9.3 | 7.0 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Neukirchen b.Sulzbach-Rosenberg | 1,726 | 87.3% | 34.0 | 18.1 | 16.4 | 8.1 | 9.8 | 4.9 | 2.8 |
| Freihung, M | 1,713 | 87.9% | 38.1 | 26.6 | 9.0 | 9.3 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| Kastl, M | 1,699 | 87.3% | 40.6 | 20.2 | 8.5 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 3.6 |
| Ebermannsdorf | 1,649 | 87.4% | 42.4 | 24.5 | 8.6 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| Schmidmühlen, M | 1,552 | 85.2% | 41.8 | 27.0 | 8.8 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| Illschwang | 1,532 | 89.7% | 39.6 | 20.5 | 12.0 | 8.1 | 6.7 | 4.7 | 3.1 |
| Ensdorf | 1,507 | 87.3% | 42.0 | 21.2 | 12.6 | 4.8 | 7.4 | 4.4 | 2.3 |
| Ammerthal | 1,486 | 89.7% | 42.3 | 22.5 | 10.0 | 4.2 | 8.2 | 3.3 | 2.2 |
| Edelsfeld | 1,335 | 85.6% | 36.4 | 18.9 | 15.0 | 9.2 | 7.5 | 3.3 | 4.1 |
| Birgland | 1,322 | 86.7% | 40.5 | 17.7 | 9.1 | 11.6 | 6.9 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Hohenburg, M | 1,156 | 87.8% | 36.0 | 27.8 | 8.4 | 7.8 | 6.6 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
| Königstein, M | 1,138 | 83.2% | 37.4 | 16.8 | 10.7 | 20.9 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 |
| Etzelwang | 956 | 86.8% | 34.1 | 18.3 | 15.3 | 9.5 | 9.8 | 5.3 | 2.0 |
| Weigendorf | 849 | 86.5% | 37.5 | 19.2 | 13.7 | 5.8 | 9.7 | 6.2 | 2.4 |
| Hirschbach | 796 | 85.1% | 30.5 | 22.1 | 13.9 | 12.7 | 9.7 | 3.5 | 2.3 |
| Gebenbach | 608 | 92.0% | 41.7 | 21.0 | 5.8 | 11.4 | 10.4 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by polling district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Municipal results are the sum of a municipality's polling districts including the postal-vote districts assigned to it. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.