Eichstätt: the 2025 federal election result
In the federal election on 23 February 2025, CSU led in Eichstätt with 42.8% of the second votes, followed by AfD with 20.9%. Below, the results of all 30 municipalities.
- District AdministratorAnton Knapp (CSU), since 2008 · Wikidata
- Turnout87.1% · Bavaria 84.3% · Germany 82.5%
- Voters86,177 of 98,895 eligible voters
- Compared with BavariaCSU +5.6 · AfD +1.9 · SPD −2.0 · Grüne −3.8
- CSU range across municipalities38.0% to 53.9%
Second votes in Eichstätt
Deviation from the state result in points.
- CSU42.8%+5.6
- AfD20.9%+1.9
- SPD9.5%-2.0
- Grüne8.2%-3.8
- Freie Wähler5.6%+1.3
- Linke4.1%-1.6
- FDP3.5%-0.7
- BSW2.7%-0.4
- Volt0.5%-0.1
- Others2.1%-0.2
Change compared with the result in Bavaria.
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by independent city and district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.
Strongest party by municipality in Eichstätt
Tap to open the municipality result. Labels appear on the largest municipalities by area; all values are in the table below.
All municipalities in Eichstätt
Sorted by number of voters. Range across the district: CSU 38 to 53.9%, AfD 13.2 to 28.1%, SPD 3.8 to 13.1%, Grüne 4.2 to 17.1%, Freie Wähler 2.9 to 9.7%, Linke 1.5 to 8.4%, FDP 2.3 to 5.1%.
| Municipality | Voters | Turnout | CSU | AfD | SPD | Grüne | Freie Wähler | Linke | FDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eichstätt | 8,252 | 86.2% | 38.0 | 13.2 | 10.9 | 17.1 | 2.9 | 8.4 | 3.6 |
| Gaimersheim, M | 7,741 | 86.1% | 39.7 | 19.5 | 12.3 | 10.2 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Beilngries, St | 6,425 | 87.5% | 44.9 | 22.8 | 7.7 | 7.1 | 5.9 | 3.6 | 3.4 |
| Kösching, M | 6,168 | 86.5% | 42.0 | 19.7 | 13.1 | 8.0 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Altmannstein, M | 4,697 | 86.6% | 44.7 | 22.7 | 7.5 | 5.4 | 8.4 | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| Großmehring | 4,647 | 86.0% | 40.6 | 24.9 | 9.2 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 4.1 |
| Kipfenberg, M | 3,556 | 87.3% | 45.2 | 22.5 | 8.2 | 6.7 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 3.1 |
| Wettstetten | 3,390 | 87.0% | 42.7 | 18.5 | 13.1 | 8.2 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| Denkendorf | 3,060 | 86.6% | 39.4 | 25.7 | 10.2 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 3.1 |
| Lenting | 2,872 | 81.2% | 40.2 | 21.0 | 12.6 | 7.3 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 3.7 |
| Stammham | 2,681 | 87.3% | 40.0 | 25.2 | 10.1 | 8.5 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 3.3 |
| Pförring, M | 2,650 | 86.5% | 40.1 | 28.1 | 6.7 | 4.7 | 9.4 | 2.8 | 3.4 |
| Buxheim | 2,476 | 88.6% | 43.7 | 20.5 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 5.1 |
| Schernfeld | 2,136 | 88.2% | 45.6 | 22.1 | 5.8 | 6.7 | 7.7 | 4.2 | 2.3 |
| Hitzhofen | 2,102 | 90.4% | 44.5 | 20.4 | 10.1 | 8.6 | 5.3 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Adelschlag | 2,085 | 89.0% | 44.5 | 20.5 | 8.9 | 6.8 | 5.8 | 4.0 | 3.9 |
| Pollenfeld | 2,026 | 90.8% | 49.9 | 18.9 | 7.2 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 3.4 | 3.0 |
| Eitensheim | 1,912 | 87.5% | 45.0 | 19.9 | 9.2 | 7.6 | 5.4 | 4.3 | 3.7 |
| Titting, M | 1,849 | 90.2% | 51.5 | 20.1 | 3.8 | 6.0 | 9.7 | 1.5 | 3.4 |
| Hepberg | 1,830 | 86.2% | 40.4 | 20.2 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 4.7 |
| Dollnstein, M | 1,787 | 86.8% | 43.2 | 22.2 | 10.4 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 2.4 |
| Kinding, M | 1,755 | 90.6% | 53.9 | 16.9 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 2.4 |
| Wellheim, M | 1,714 | 84.7% | 38.2 | 24.0 | 11.3 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 2.6 |
| Walting | 1,617 | 90.4% | 45.4 | 22.1 | 7.5 | 7.6 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Nassenfels, M | 1,569 | 91.8% | 44.0 | 23.5 | 5.7 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Mindelstetten | 1,240 | 90.4% | 47.7 | 23.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 9.3 | 3.6 | 2.3 |
| Böhmfeld | 1,170 | 89.0% | 46.1 | 15.2 | 11.1 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| Mörnsheim, M | 989 | 85.8% | 41.7 | 27.3 | 6.9 | 5.0 | 7.9 | 4.0 | 2.3 |
| Oberdolling | 939 | 88.7% | 47.6 | 22.5 | 8.6 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 2.9 |
| Egweil | 842 | 87.6% | 48.9 | 21.8 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 4.2 |
Source: Federal Returning Officer, 2025 federal election, results by polling district (file), final result, retrieved 7 Sep 2026, Data licence Germany, attribution 2.0. Municipal results are the sum of a municipality's polling districts including the postal-vote districts assigned to it. Compiled by wahlergebnisse.io.